Feel nervous about your number-crunching math skills? Try to improve by practicing our Consulting Case Interview Fast Math Drills quiz. Note: No calculator is allowed during the quiz, and you may use a pencil and a piece of scratch paper. Try your best to answer all 10 questions in 10 minutes. The correct answers will be shown at the end of the quiz.
Subscribe and Follow us

Categories
- Case Interview Questions (685)
- add capacity & growth (47)
- business competition (55)
- business turnaround (27)
- estimate/guesstimate (48)
- finance & economics (26)
- improve profitability (105)
- increase sale/revenue (75)
- industry analysis (44)
- market entry (47)
- market sizing (58)
- math problem (59)
- merger & acquisition (47)
- new business (67)
- new product (68)
- operations strategy (67)
- organizational behavior (43)
- PE & investment (31)
- pricing & valuation (48)
- reduce cost (52)
- Consulting Firms (386)
- Consulting Job Offers (27)
- Management Consultants (31)
- Management Consulting (29)
- News (12)
- Case Interview Questions (685)

10/10 in just under 6
Nice site btw
9/10 in 9 1/2 mins
10 in 10 in 12.5 min with a good guesstimate in #6
9/10 in 12 min.
I think there may be a problem with Q9. I believe the answer is 12 (not listed on the options) because:
1. 1/7 of 130 is 18.6, but you can’t have 0.6 customers. Therefore, you only made 18 drinks sales.
2. Out of the 18 sales, 70% is water. Again, you get 12.6, and based on the same reasoning as above, you sold 12 bottles.
There’s no error, just state it in full first without estimating and you’ll find it easy to simplify:
0.7 x 130 / 7 = 13
Didnt understand Q6. If original price was X, then you buy at X + 0.30 and sell at 4.00, then the percentage you take home would be (4.00 – (X+0.30)) / (X+0.30). Am I understanding the question right? Thanks.
I solved it like this. 3.7 (x) = 4.0 ==> solved for x and got 1.081. Therefore, 8.1% increase.
10 out 10 in 14′
Really good questions – but could someone tell me why do we use 27, not 9, in question 1? I thought that if we triple the number each day, we should have a following equation to solve: 3 x 3 x 34,500. Any help more than appreciated!
Thursday -> Friday -> Saturday -> Sunday, thus 3 x 3 x 3 = 27
9/10 in 7 minutes
Q6: The solution is clear to me but how do you calculate 0.3 / 3.7 without any calculator? Fast help would be appreciated. Thank you.
If you were born and raised in the US where kids learn to to use calculators for every calculation in grade school, even for the simplest arithmetics, it may be hard for you to understand, but believe me, kids in China, India, Russia, etc., can do 0.3 / 3.7 easily with a pencil and scratch paper. I can show you if you want.
What you say about schools and calculators is true. In fact we never learned to divide by 2 digit numbers by hand, as far as I can remember. But now as I looked it up, it seems that there is no better way than doing it as divisions with 1 digit divisors, which can be pretty slow for me because you need to estimate a lot …
You don’t need to do the whole division. Read the answers briefly first then proceed with dividing. If you divide correctly, you’ll find there’s only possible answer after one step. (c. in this case). Hope this helps, mk
Don’t need to. Solve it this way ==> 3.7 (X) = 4.0 ==> solve for X and get 1.081. Therefore 8.1% increase.
approximate 0.3/3.7 to 0.3/3.6 which is 1/12. 1/12 is half of 1/6 which is 16.6%… so 1/12 is 8.3%
that’s my “fast” method!
Can someone clarify Q2? What is the formula for it? I thought you would add the square of 150 and 200 and then the square root of the answer would be it (250) – which is the formula to find the third side of a triangle. But that’s incorrect. Any insight would be appreciated!
2h
Remember pythagoras theorem ?
This is a 3:4:5 right triangle.
10 out of 10 in 9 minutes
Awesome problems. They present the ideal mix of being challenging, yet doable. Nice use of traps as well – I got caught by the one in #8 and answered C.
9/10 in 9min49sec… not bad!
Good job! I got 8/10 right in 11 mins.
7 out of 10 in 13 minutes. Very interesting case !!